The Gathering Storm

The Fraud That Is Obama

When this pathetic fraud is finally tossed to the trash heap of history there will be amazing disclosures about him that will rock the world and permanently discredit the U.S. mainstream media.

The Fraud That Is Obama 

Why Aren't Murderous Communists Condemned Like Nazis Are?

By WALTER E. WILLIAMS
Posted 08/06/2012 06:58 PM ET

In Europe, especially in Germany, hoisting a swastika-emblazoned Nazi flag is a crime. For decades after World War II, people have hunted down and sought punishment for Nazi murderers, who were responsible for the deaths of more than 20 million people.

Here's my question: Why are the horrors of Nazism so well-known and widely condemned, but not those of socialism and communism? What goes untaught — and possibly is covered up — is that socialist and communist ideas have produced the greatest evil in mankind's history.

You say, "Williams, what in the world are you talking about? Socialists, communists and their fellow travelers, such as the Wall Street Occupiers supported by our president, care about the little guy in his struggle for a fair shake! They're trying to promote social justice."

Let's look at some of the history of socialism and communism.

What's not appreciated is that Nazism is a form of socialism. In fact, the term Nazi stands for the National Socialist German Workers' Party. The unspeakable acts of Adolf Hitler's Nazis pale in comparison with the horrors committed by the communists in the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the People's Republic of China.

Under The Red Flag

Between 1917 and 1987, Vladimir Lenin, Josef Stalin and their successors murdered and were otherwise responsible for the deaths of 62 million of their own people. Between 1949 and 1987, China's communists, led by Mao Zedong and his successors, murdered and were otherwise responsible for the deaths of 76 million Chinese.

The most authoritative tally of history's most murderous regimes is documented on University of Hawaii Professor Rudolph J. Rummel's website, at http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills, and in his book "Death by Government."

How much hunting down and punishment have there been for these communist murderers? To the contrary, it's acceptable both in Europe and in the U.S. to hoist and march under the former USSR's red flag emblazoned with a hammer and sickle.

Mao Zedong has been long admired by academics and leftists across our country, as they often marched around singing the praises of Mao and waving his little red book, "Quotations From Chairman Mao Tse-tung." President Obama's communications director, Anita Dunn, in her June 2009 commencement address to St. Andrews Episcopal High School at Washington National Cathedral, said Mao was one of her heroes.

Path To Genocide

Whether it's the academic community, the media elite, stalwarts of the Democratic Party or organizations such as the NAACP, the National Council of La Raza, Green for All, the Sierra Club and the Children's Defense Fund, there is a great tolerance for the ideas of socialism — a system that has caused more deaths and human misery than all other systems combined.

Today's leftists, socialists and progressives would bristle at the suggestion that their agenda differs little from those of Nazi, Soviet and Maoist mass murderers. One does not have to be in favor of death camps or wars of conquest to be a tyrant. The only requirement is that one has to believe in the primacy of the state over individual rights.

The unspeakable horrors of Nazism didn't happen overnight. They were simply the end result of a long evolution of ideas leading to consolidation of power in central government in the quest for "social justice."

It was decent but misguided earlier generations of Germans — who would have cringed at the thought of genocide — who created the Trojan horse for Hitler's ascendancy. Today's Americans are similarly accepting the massive consolidation of power in Washington in the name of social justice.

If you don't believe it, just ask yourself: Which way are we headed tiny steps at a time — toward greater liberty or toward more government control over our lives?

Perhaps we think we're better people than the Germans who created the conditions that brought Hitler to power. I say, don't count on it.

Unanswered Questions

1. In 1961, people of color were called 'Negroes.' How can the Obama 'birth certificate' state he is African-American when the term wasn't even used at that time?

2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961. It also lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. At the time of Obama's birth, it also states that his father is 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in Kenya , East Africa. This wouldn't seem like anything of concern except that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two years after Obama's birth and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the British East Africa Protectorate.

3. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is Kapi'olani Maternity Gynecological Hospital. This cannot be because the hospital(s) in question in 1961
were called Kaui Keolani Children's Hospital and Kapi'olani Maternity Home, respectively. 

The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978 when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name didn't exist until 1978?
 
SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS ARE NOT REASSIGNED
 
An intensive investigation has revealed the identity of the man whose Social Security number (SSN) is being used by President Obama: Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, immigrated to the United States in 1924, and was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 (Obama's current SSN) on or about March 1977.

Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut . Because of that, his SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select few reserved for Connecticut residents. Obama never lived or worked in that state. There is no reason on earth for his SSN to start with the digits 042...except that Ludwig spent the final months of his life in Hawaii, where he died.

Conveniently, Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, worked part-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse, and had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals. The Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig's death, and because he never received Social Security benefits there were no benefits to stop and no questions were ever raised.

The suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not a U.S. Citizen, either because he was born in Kenya or became a citizen of Indonesia upon his adoption by Lolo Soetoro simply scoured the probate records until she found someone who died who was not receiving Social Security benefits, and selected Mr. Ludwig's Connecticut SSN for Obama.

Although many Americans do not understand the meaning of the term "natural born" there are few who do not understand that if you are using someone else's SSN it is a clear indication of fraud.Resources:

http://www.kapiolani.org/women-and-children/about-us/default.aspx   

 
Post-colonial history (from Wikipedia)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Kenya

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya>  

The Heavy Burden of Government

A Commentary By Scott Rasmussen  

In my hometown, everyone is required to have a landline telephone so local officials can reach us with a reverse 911 call.

It's a nice idea, but it doesn't work. In my family, we never use the landline. We talk on cellphones. Occasionally, telemarketers call. So do people looking for someone named "Danny," but we no longer answer. So, if a call came from our local government, we'd never hear their message. But when you're building a house and need to pass inspection, it's easier to put in the phone than fight city hall.
 
Overall, 68 percent of Americans believe there are too many unnecessary laws in the United States today. A majority of Republicans, Democrats and unaffiliated voters all recognize the problem.
 
Most excess laws are just a nuisance and not a real problem. But there are plenty of horror stories where individual lives are ruined for technical violations of unknown and unnecessary laws. Sometimes the harassment is aimed at a particular citizen; sometimes it's just bureaucracy gone wild.

In his 2009 book, "Three Felonies a Day," civil rights attorney Harvey Silverglate shows that "prosecutors can pin arguable federal crimes on any one of us, for even the most seemingly innocuous behavior."

That's one reason 51 percent now believe that the government is more of a threat to individual rights than a protector of them. It's why people react so negatively to nanny-state proposals like banning the sale of large sugary drinks. Just 24 percent support that idea.

Encountering unnecessary laws is just one reason people have come to see government in America as a burden. Half (50 percent) believe more government involvement makes society less fair. Only 22 percent believe it increases fairness.

Government is also seen as a burden on the economy. And this extends beyond the heavy cost of taxation. Every entrepreneur can share war stories of overcoming government-imposed obstacles to succeed.

Here's a basic point that many politicians miss: Just because a problem exists doesn't mean people want the government to fix it. For example, 69 percent believe executives at major companies get paid too much, but only 17 percent want the government to regulate their pay.

To hold people and companies accountable, Americans believe in competition more than government. By a 2-to-1 margin, people believe more competition and less regulation is the way to fix the financial system. By a 3-to-1 margin, they say the same about health care. That's because competition puts consumers in charge, while regulation puts bureaucrats in charge.

Put it all together, and it's easy to understand why 66 percent believe that the best thing government could do to help the economy is cut spending. Americans have come to view the government as a burden that is weighing down the economy and the nation.

This is not an anti-government attitude, it's simply a desire to have government play its proper role in society. Too many politicians, from both political parties, believe the government's job is to run the country. A healthier view is to recognize that our government was designed to play a support role rather than take the lead.

As I wrote in my book "In Search of Self-Governance," the American people do not want to be governed from the left, the right or the center. They want to govern themselves.

To find out more about Scott Rasmussen, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit www.creators.com. 

THE CULTURAL REVOLUTION OF THE RIGHT

Written by Dr. Jack Wheeler

Thursday, 02 August 2012

Catalysts are funny things - especially historical ones.  For close to a half-century, America has been in steady decline due to the Left's Cultural Revolution of the 60s (although Ronald Reagan temporarily slowed it down, even he couldn't reverse it).  Who would have ever guessed that its demise and America's revival would be sparked by a chicken sandwich? For decades, year after unrelenting year, drip by never-stopping drip, the Hate-America Marxists of the Scumbag Left infesting our schools, media, and cultural institutions perpetrated one outrage after another to damage America's founding values and wound America's soul. And for all that time, no matter how much we yelled and complained, the end result has been the same: we let them get away with it.  We remained frogs in the water, as the Left slowly and steadily increased the heat.  You'd have thought that Zero's cranking up the flame under the pot we're in would have caused an en masse bolting out of it. But no.  For 3½ years now, no matter how much Zero turned up the heat, Americans stayed in the pot for fear of being condemned as racists if they bolted.  Large numbers made an attempt in the 2010 elections, but didn't succeed in escaping.  Then finally it happened, the over-the-top act of total hubris that precipitates a fall from power.  By attacking with hysterical viciousness a decent moral man over his views that up until recently any sane person would have considered as obvious as the sky is blue, the Scumbag Left exposed itself as irretrievably fascist and inhuman.  A chicken sandwich caused people to realize the Left hates what makes us human.  Actually, what made us human, what enabled us to become human in the evolutionary first place. This realization is not consciously articulated - it is limbic, so ancient it lies at our emotional core, which is why there was an astounding amount of support for Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day yesterday (8/01) across the entire country.  Marriage - or "pair-bonding" between a man and a woman as the paleontologists call it - and the resultant nuclear family unit created our species. Just about everyone this side of lefty loonies understands this in their bones, way deep in our psyches.  To understand it clearly, you need to absorb Marriage and the Missing Link (TTP, May 2009).  I'd even suggest your taking a break and looking at it now, then we'll resume our discussion... ...OK, so now you get that yesterday at a thousand or more Chick-fil-A's was the start of something fundamental, a catalyst for the pent-up revulsion so many millions feel towards the Scumbag Left.  We are seeing something emerge that's more than the putative issues driving this election - the economy and jobs, as important as those are.  We are seeing the emergence of a Cultural Revolution of the Right. Thus this election of 2012 may be more transformational than we thought.  Last June, we discussed Will Romney Be Our FDR?  In 1932, FDR effected a basic transformation in the relationship between Americans and their government.  Today, 80 years later, that transformation has run its course, it's broke, obsolete, can't solve any of today's problems (indeed, it's become the cause of our political problems), and is dying. Thus Romney has the opportunity to effect a political transformation similar to FDR's in form and opposite in direction - the direction towards the freedom to prosper and Constitutional government. Yet that is a political and economic transformation, which though hugely important, doesn't ring folks' limbic bells.  Their culture does, wherein lies their basic values, what gives their lives meaning and a sense of identity.  Which is why the Left's assault on America starting in the 60s was called the Cultural Revolution, as it was not primarily about political or economic power but cultural power, gaining control of America's cultural institutions. And it succeeded.  The Left has held monopoly power over almost all of America's central cultural bastions for at least 40 years now - movies, plays, music, art, museums, literature, literary magazines, all of academia from K-12 through college, television, and of course, the propaganda organ of the Left, the BM (Big Media). It's time to bust this monopoly.  The New Media, from talk radio to conservative websites (like To The Point!) to social networking, has led the way.  We are now on the cusp of turning November 2012 into a transformational election politically, economically, and culturally. Romney, I am becoming more and more convinced, is going to win in a landslide.  The latest indication is Ted Cruz's blowout Tea Party win in Texas on Tuesday (7/31).  Zero will be lucky to carry a dozen states.  His loss will be a mortal blow to the Left's cultural dominance.  It will take a long time to complete a conservative "march through the institutions," but in November 2012 it will begin.  In truth, it began yesterday with a million folks eating a chicken sandwich.  Ted Cruz understands this.  In his victory speech Tuesday night, he talked of a "great awakening".  Ted knows his history and chooses his words on purpose.  America's first cultural revolution was called The Great Awakening, a spiritual resurgence during the 1730s and 40s that enabled the American Revolution. What we are going to witness on Wednesday, November 7th, is an explosion of optimism - not just in the markets (although not all:  gold will plunge), but in the future of our country.  Yes, there most likely will be an explosion of violence by the moochers, but that will be short-lived.  And it may take a while for the under-30 set to overcome their dark pessimism about their future - especially for those who have a Masters Degree in Puppetry. All the moochers and puppeteers, however, will be swamped by the vast numbers of regular Americans excited about having their country back, and eager to rebuild it and their future.  None of them will pay the slightest attention to the moanings and phony moralisms of the BM - except to dismiss them with Rick Gorka's immortal three words. Folks, it's going to be exciting to be an American again.  We all love being American, but face it, it's been an extreme bummer with the current schmuck in the Oval Office.  More, we're going to reclaim our culture.  We're going to make more money and have more freedom - but even cooler, we are going to be cultural revolutionaries.  Revolutionaries for decency, integrity, responsibility, earned achievement, and every other bourgeois moral value that normal people aspire to and the Left hates. It's our turn.  History is coming our way.  Get ready and be prepared for your role in the Cultural Revolution of the Right.

Muppets Are Pro-Homosexual Marriage

For years we’ve heard rumors that Muppet characters Bert and Ernie were homosexual lovers. They may very soon come out of the closet and get married while children are glued to Sesame Street. It’s OK for a company that creates children’s programming to promote homosexual marriage, but it’s not OK for a company to take a position against homosexual marriage. Bizarre.

Jim Henson Studios will no longer allow their Muppet Toys to be used by Chick-Fil-A restaurants because of the chain’s owners support of heterosexual marriage. Here’s the latest from the pro-homosexual bullies:

The Jim Henson Company has celebrated and embraced diversity and inclusiveness for over fifty years and we have notified Chick-Fil-A that we do not wish to partner with them on any future endeavors. Lisa Henson, our CEO is personally a strong supporter of gay marriage and has directed us to donate the payment we received from Chick-Fil-A to GLAAD.

Henson and Company have been delivering a subliminal pro-homosexual message to children for 50 years. Who knew?

Intolerance of the left runs deep. It started when homosexual groups learned that Chick-fil-A supported biblical — one man/one woman — marriage. Gasp! I know; it’s shocking.

A report from the LGBT advocacy group Equality Matters said that Chick-fil-A donated more than $3 million from 2003 to 2009 to Christian groups that oppose homosexuality. The company then escalated its donations, giving $2 million to such causes in 2010 alone, according to Equality Matters.

I say, good riddance to Bert and Ernie and the whole Muppet crowd. It’s not that Children’s programming didn’t get political. Disney Studios, the company that owns a piece of the Muppets’ franchise, used to ridicule Nazis and Communists. Now they’re in bed with the homosexual marriage lobby, taking lessons from what they used to attack. Take a look at “The Story of One of ‘Hitler’s Children’ as Adapted from Education for Death: The Meaning of the Nazi.”

Read more: http://politicaloutcast.com/2012/07/muppets-propagandize-children-to-support-homosexual-marriage/#ixzz21eP6Ajmv