Monday, April 30, 2012

The Debt Dilemma in Plain English

Watch this three-minute video to understand the gravity of the national debt problem...

Click here...

The Hustle

Here is the Obama campaign's message...

And the Romney campaign had better counter every single lie with the truth!

Sunday, April 29, 2012

Yes, Obama Killed Osama

He also killed...
  • Our economy
  • Our credit rating
  • The coal industry
  • The oil and natural gas industry
  • The healthcare industry
  • Job creation
  • The banking industry
  • Small businesses
  • Our relationship with Israel
  • Our relationship with Great Britain
  • The housing industry
  • Hope
  • And a whole lot more! 
Yep, that Obama is one helluva killing machine. You go, Barack...right back to Chicago where you belong!

*Thanks to RedState for some of the above content.

Medicare Rate Hikes Are Coming

But the "Big One" is after the election (what a coincidence)...

The per person Medicare Insurance Premium will increase from the present Monthly Fee of $96.40, rising to...

$104.20 in 2012

$120.20 in 2013


$247.00 in 2014.

"That was hilarious..."

Yes, Jimmy, it was hilarious to think that America rallied around Barack Obama for a better future.

It was hilarious. Courageous as hell, too, since Obama has NO sense of humor when the humor is directed at him. Well done, Jimmy!

Saturday, April 28, 2012

EPA Conducts Human Experiments (Yes, unbelievably, they did!)

By Kevin “Coach” Collins

This is a very serious and outrageous story. It brings on alternating waves of anger and embarrassment. The Environmental Protection Agency has used human beings our fellow Americans, as experimental lab rats! Yes they have purposely exposed people, our neighbors to high levels of airborne “particulate matter – soot and dust known as PM2.5. 

If it were not for the diligent work of we won’t have heard about this. Using a Freedom of Information Act application has discovered what the EPA has done and let us all know about it. Naturally the Democrat cheerleaders in the media covered this up. 

The revelation about these Dr. Menegele type experiments conducted under the supervision of EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson, are chilling. In order to build a portfolio of evidence against coal fired energy plants that Obama can cite to shut them down, the EPA had 41 people breathe in dangerous soot to see if they would die.  During her September 2011 testimony that went unreported by the media, Jackson told the House Energy and Commerce Committee, 

“Particulate matter causes premature death. It doesn’t make you sick. It’s directly causal to dying sooner than you should.”  One of the unwitting volunteers has since developed heart problems but since none have died the experiment failed – yes failed.

 The prevailing theory about the effects of inhaling this type of soot holds that the victims dies so quickly that he/she doesn’t even get “sick” the commonly understood meaning of the word.  

When asked what benefit could be realized from letting people purposely be exposed to death by choking to death Jackson said cutting the introduction of these dangerous particulates into the air across the country would cut cancer deaths so dramatically that it would be the equivalent to curing cancer!  

The EPA chose to report only the single case involving the onset of heart problems among the test group of 41 and in classic Obama style merely “forgot” about the other 40 people. 

We didn’t hear about this human guinea pig experiment it failed to kill enough people and the media decided we shouldn't know about it. We know the media are Democrat cheerleaders, but what is the excuse for the Republican House letting this go unreported?  Joseph Menegele would feel right at home among today’s Democrats. 

To contact your Congressional Representative use this link: 

To read more use this link:

Gee, what a surprise...

Private Sector Experience

The percentage of each past president's cabinet who had worked in the private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet. Here are the percentages.
T. Roosevelt.................... 38%
Taft.................................. 40%
Wilson ........................... 52%
Harding........................... 49%
Coolidge......................... 48%
Hoover............................ 42%
F. Roosevelt................... 50%
Truman........................... 50%
Eisenhower................ .... 57%
Kennedy......................... 30%
Johnson.......................... 47%
Nixon.............................. 53%
Ford................................ 42%
Carter............................. 32%
Reagan........................... 56%
GH Bush......................... 51%
Clinton .......................... 39%
GW Bush........................ 55%
Obama..................... 8%

Any questions?

Didn't think so.

What we have to look forward to with ObamaCare

A recent "Investor's Business Daily" article provided very interesting statistics from a survey by the United Nations International Health Organization.

Percentage of men and women who survived a cancer five years after diagnosis:
             U.S.                    65%
             England              46%
             Canada               42%
Percentage of patients diagnosed with diabetes who received treatment within six months:
             U.S.                     93%
             England              15%
             Canada               43%
Percentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received it within six months:
             U.S.                     90%
             England              15%
             Canada               43%
Percentage referred to a medical specialist who see one within one month:
             U.S.                     77%
             England              40%
             Canada               43%
Number of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million people:
             U.S.                     71
             England             14
             Canada              18
Percentage of seniors (65+), with low income, who say they are in "excellent health":
             U.S.                    12%
             England               2%
             Canada               6%
And now for the last statistic:
            National Health Insurance?
             U.S.                     NO
             England            YES
             Canada             YES

The Fruits of Illegal Immigration

This from the L. A. Times...

1. 40% of all workers in L.A. County (L A. County has 10.2 million people) are working for cash and not paying taxes. This is because they are predominantly illegal immigrants working without a green card.

2. 95% of warrants for murder in Los Angeles are for illegal aliens.

3. 75% of people on the most wanted list in Los Angeles are illegal aliens.

4. Over 2/3 of all births in Los Angeles County are to illegal alien Mexicans on Medi-Cal, whose births were paid for by taxpayers.

5. Nearly 35% of all inmates in California detention centers are Mexican nationals here illegally.
6. Over 300,000 illegal aliens in Los Angeles County are living in garages.

7. The FBI reports half of all gang members in Los Angeles are most likely illegal aliens from south of the border.

8. Nearly 60% of all occupants of HUD properties are illegal.

9. 21 radio stations in L. A. are Spanish speaking. 

10. In L.A. County 5.1 million people speak English, 3.9 million speak Spanish. (There are 10.2 million people in L.A. County.)

(All 10 of the above are from the Los Angeles Times)

And Nationally...

1. Less than 2% of illegal aliens are picking our crops, but 29% are on welfare. 

2. Over 70% of the United States' annual population growth (and over 90% of California, Florida, and New York) results from immigration. 

3. 29% of inmates in federal prisons are illegal aliens.

Great News on the Horizon!

April 23, 2012

The Generic Ballot Bomb

At this point in a presidential election year, Americans are inundated with polls.  Often these polls provide no real information at all, except the bias and the population samples of the polling organization.

As one example, consider this polling data released for April 16 showing the matchup between Obama and Romney.  Depending upon the polling organization, Romney leads Obama by 2 (Gallup), trails Obama by 9 (CNN/Opinion Research), trails Obama by 4 (Reuters/Ipsos), or leads Obama by 3 (Rasmussen). 

Presidential match-up polls are notoriously unpredictable six months before an election.  Will the recent scandal involving Secret Service agents and prostitutes -- some perhaps even underage prostitutes -- during the president's visit to Colombia suppress his approval for a few weeks?  Probably, but that is highly unlikely to swing a presidential election.  Moreover, it is almost certain not to have much effect on the other races in 2012 -- Senate races, House races, six governorships, and thousands of state legislative seats.

There is, however, a poll which does show the partisan leaning of America: the generic congressional ballot.  When a voter goes to the polls in November, a "generic" favoring of one party over another will often be the decisive factor in casting a ballot.  Indeed, the huge sweep of Republicans up and down the ballot in 2010 can only be explained by this massive and generic rejection of Democrats.  So this poll is as close to a straightforward question about which political party a respondent will support in the next election as any question asked in polls.

What does the generic congressional ballot say about 2012?  Rasmussen asks likely voters which party the respondent intends to support in the next congressional election each week and announces the results every Monday.  Over the last three years, likely voters in this poll have favored Republicans over Democrats almost every single week.  At this time last year, the Republican edge was 42% to 40%.  One week, in November, the parties tied at 41% to 41%, and one week, at the end of January, Democrats held a one-point 41%-to-40% advantage.  Since March, however, the Republican advantage has been growing -- the practical end of the Republican fighting for the nomination is a logical explanation for the change -- and since the beginning of March, the Republican advantage per week has progressed thus: +3%, +6%, +4%, +5%, +6%, +5%, +10%. 

The trend of other generic congressional ballot polls is the same.  Ipsos, which asks "all voters," rather than "likely voters" -- a polling population which favors Democrats -- shows this trend in its last seven polls, dating back to October 2011: -8%, -5%, -6%, -4%, -2%, -4%, -1%.  Quinnipiac has asked this question three times since last October, and the trend for Republicans is -8%, -4%, +2%.  USA Today/Gallup asked this question twice in the last six months, with the trend being -7%, -2%, and tie.  So the trend in all the polls since last August has been a steady movement of voters away from the "generic" Democrat to the "generic" Republican.       

Rasmussen, which asks the same question every week and which asks "likely voters," ought to be taken seriously.  A ten-percent advantage in the generic ballot, if carried over into other races, would mean a Republican landslide in November.  This would mean not just that Romney defeats Obama, but that Republicans win a slew of Senate races that are undecided now (Human Events, for example, is showing that Republicans have an excellent chance of defeating Senator Manchin in West Virginia).  The new congressional districts will have an inherent volatility, and a Republican wave could mean that Republicans might actually increase their majority in the House. 

The real story, though, may be in state elections.  As we have learned since 2010, stout-hearted and conservative Republicans in state government, like Walker in Wisconsin and Brewer in Arizona, if supported by Republican state legislatures, can move our agenda forward on many fronts.  Going into 2012, Republicans completely control 22 state governments (counting "nonpartisan" Nebraska's legislature as Republican), while Democrats control only 11 state governments.  It is easy to see several states -- Alaska, Iowa, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, and North Carolina -- falling under Republican control. 

Nevada and Washington could also, in a strong Republican year, be Republican states.  Additionally, Arkansas and Illinois could shift from a Democrat-controlled state to a split-control state.

A conservative political revolution with beginnings as much in the fifty states as in a Republican-controlled federal government would be an irresistible force.  Already Republicans in states have ended the mandatory deduction of union dues, passed voter ID laws, enacted laws to enforce existing immigration law, tackled the public school mafia, and passed laws to curtail or end abortion on demand. 

The "perfect storm" for conservatives would be a federal government, supported by a Supreme Court, which respects the Constitution and devolves most policy issues back to the states, with robust conservatives in state government enacting an agenda which shows the leftist parts of America the benefits of lower taxes and regulations, tort reform, wholesome social values, and true reform of public and college education.  Could this happen?  If the generic congressional ballot trend continues, it almost certainly will happen.

Page Printed from: at April 23, 2012 - 11:48:22 AM CDT        

Why don't they just ban driving?

Then everyone can take the bus and talk on their cell phones... LOL

U.S. ban sought on cell phone use while driving

Drivers of any vehicle would be covered

* 3,000 U.S. fatalities from distracted driving last year
* Approach to compliance akin to anti-drunk driving campaign

By Jim Forsyth

SAN ANTONIO, April 26 (Reuters) - U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood called on Thursday for a federal law to ban talking on a cell phone or texting while driving any type of vehicle on any road in the country.

Tough federal legislation is the only way to deal with what he called a "national epidemic," he said at a distracted-driving summit in San Antonio, Texas, that drew doctors, advocates and government officials.

LaHood said it is important for the police to have "the opportunity to write tickets when people are foolishly thinking they can drive safely or use a cell phone and text and drive."

LaHood has previously criticized behind-the-wheel use of cell phones and other devices, but calling for a federal law prohibiting the practice takes his effort to a new level.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that 3,000 fatal traffic accidents nationwide last year were the result of distracted driving. Using a cell phone while driving delays reaction time the same amount as having a blood alcohol concentration of .08, the legal limit, the highway agency said.

But Gary Biller, president of the National Motorists Association, said laws banning specific actions like talking on a phone or texting are not necessary because those actions are already covered by existing distracted-driving laws. It would be more productive, he said, to invest resources in campaigns that discourage inattentive driving in general.

"It shouldn't matter if the driver is distracted by a conversation with another vehicle passenger, tuning the radio, eating a snack, or talking on a cell phone," Biller said in a statement. "Existing laws cover all those distractions and more."

LaHood said, however, he was not as concerned about people who eat, apply makeup, or perform other distracting activities in cars because "not everyone does that."

"But everyone has a cell phone and too many of us think it is OK to talk on our phones while we are driving," he said at the summit, sponsored by insurance company USAA, the Texas Department of Transportation and Shriners Hospitals for Children.

LaHood was joined by people who have been hurt in accidents caused by motorists talking on cell phones, including children in wheelchairs who were paralyzed. Such accidents are "100 percent preventable," he said.

He compared the situation facing the United States today with the problem of drunk driving 20-30 years ago.

"It used to be that if an officer pulled you over for drunk driving, he would pat you on the back, maybe call you a cab or take you home, but he wouldn't arrest you," LaHood said. "Now that has changed, and the same enforcement can work for people who talk on cell phones while driving."

Thirty-eight states have laws restricting or outlawing the use of electronic devices while driving, LaHood said.

LaHood said his department was researching the effect that hands-free devices and new systems like Ford Motor Company's Sync have on distracting drivers. He said he has called the CEOs of major car companies and encouraged them to "think twice" before placing too many Internet-based systems into new cars. (Editing By Corrie MacLaggan and Philip Barbara)

Sen. McCain Reminds Us Of Obama's Pathetic Foreign Policy Record

"Shame on Barack Obama for diminishing the memory of September 11th and the killing of Osama bin Laden by turning it into a cheap political attack ad. This is the same President who once criticized Hillary Clinton for invoking bin Laden 'to score political points.'

"This is the same President who said, after bin Laden was dead, that we shouldn't 'spike the ball' after the touchdown. And now Barack Obama is not only trying to score political points by invoking Osama bin Laden, he is doing a shameless end-zone dance to help himself get reelected.

"No one disputes that the President deserves credit for ordering the raid, but to politicize it in this way is the height of hypocrisy.

"The Obama campaign asks whether Mitt Romney would have made that decision. Of course they want to focus on this one tactical decision because the other decisions this President has made have harmed our national security.

"He turned his back on the people of Iran when they rose up to end their tyrannical, terrorist-supporting, Holocaust-denying government, giving them no assistance as they were crushed in the streets.

"He has repeatedly thrown our ally Israel under the bus and jeopardized our shared security interests.

"He tried to bring Khaled Sheikh Muhammed, the mastermind of 9/11, and other Al-Qaeda terrorists into the middle of New York City to stand trial in a civilian court.

"He disregarded the advice of his military commanders and pulled all of our troops out of Iraq, and Al-Qaeda is making a comeback there as a result.

"He disregarded the advice of his military commanders again by telling our enemies that we are leaving Afghanistan and then putting our mission and our troops at risk by short-changing our commanders on the ground.

"He watches passively while the Assad regime in Syria, Iran's closest ally, kills thousands of its own people in an unfair fight, and his response to this mass atrocity is to create an 'Atrocities Prevention Board.'

"With a record like that on national security, it is no wonder why President Obama is shamelessly turning the one decision he got right into a pathetic political act of self-congratulation."

Friday, April 27, 2012

It would be funny...

...if it weren't true!

The Trouble With Black Box Voting

Spanish Company Associated w/Geo. Soros Will “Count” America's Votes Overseas In November

From The Western Center for Journalism in a piece entitled, "Spanish Company Will 'Count' American Votes Overseas In November,' they state the following in this excerpt:

"When the Spanish online voting company SCYTL bought the largest vote processing corporation in the United States, it also acquired the means of manufacturing the outcome of the 2012 election. For SOE, the Tampa based corporation purchased by SCYTL in January, supplies the election software which records, counts, and reports the votes of Americans in 26 states–900 total jurisdictions–across the nation. ..." Find the rest of the article @

And if that doesn't make you squirm, George Soros is closely associated w/one of Obama's biggest contributors who, himself, is involved with SCYTL, the company that is going to count the votes!! Keep reading.

"Those who cast the votes decide nothing. 
Those who count the votes decide everything." -- 
Joseph Stalin

From: It Makes Sense Blog, ( they allege that,

"GEORGE SOROS WILL CONTROL YOUR VOTES IN THE UP COMING PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION -- Follow the bouncing ball on the criminal corruption ruse of your USA votes.

1.) The Obama Government has outsourced the counting of votes for the 2012 election. But since WHEN does the nation need to outsource a task as uncomplicated and straightforward as vote-counting?

2.) Obama outsorced the counting to a Tampa Florida company, named SOE, that had previously been used to administer the vote counting process for over 500 American jurisdictions.

3.) But recently, SOE software has now been sold to a company named SCYTL, owned by George Soros, headquartered in Spain.

4.) The votes will go to SCYTL, the question becomes as to WHY Must local votes for each precinct will be downloaded to SCYTL’s main server – leaving no TRACEABLE record of how many, and what votes were scored! Which of course means that said votes will be MERGED; and any discrepancies at lower levels will be IMPOSSIBLE to track.


But wait, it gets murkier: SCYTL is shadow owned by Pere Valles, a former CEO of Global Net; who just HAPPENS to have been a maximum level contributor to the Obama Campaign in 2008. Not surprisingly, Valles is also has contacts with Media Matters, a communication consortium owned by: George Soros.

6.) Now the bad news: according to the “Black Box” voting site, this centralizes one “middleman” access point for over 525 voting jurisdictions: (AL, AZ, CA, CO, DC, FL, KY, MI, KS, IL, IN, NC, NM, MN, NY, SC, TX, UT, WA. – and growing)." The rest of the article is a click away. Follow this link to

This is outrageous! Though I am not sure that George Soros owns SCYTL in fact, he nonetheless has close association with the people who run that operation. It just stinks!

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Obama's Father May Be Frank Marshall Davis

 By Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D

“Who’s your real Daddy?” is a question that remarkably continues to dog Barack Obama, even as he proceeds into his fourth year as president.

With the release this July of Joel Gilbert’s full-length documentary, “Dreams from My Real Father: A Story of Reds and Deception,” the mystery deepens regarding who Obama really is.

“The film provides the first cohesive understanding of Obama’s deep-rooted life journey in socialism, from his childhood to his presidency,” Gilbert told WND.

Gilbert rejects the official story that the Kenyan-born Barack Obama was the president’s father.
Instead, he argues, Frank Marshall Davis, the radical poet and journalist who was a card-carrying member of the Communist Party USA, was the real, biological and ideological father of Barack Obama.

“I decided to investigate Frank Marshall Davis. His close physical resemblance to Obama was shocking, while Obama little resembled the Kenyan Obama,” Gilbert said. “How could this be?”

Gilbert launched into what became two years of research during which he conducted interviews and discovered rare film footage and photos.

“I unearthed two film archives of Frank Marshall Davis, one from 1973, the other from 1987, as well as Davis’ photo collection,” he explained. “I then acquired 500 copies of the Honolulu Record, the communist-run newspaper where Davis wrote a weekly political column for eight years.”

Gilbert’s research turned shocking when he obtained seven indecent photos of Ann Dunham, Obama’s mother, at Frank Marshall Davis’ house, suggesting an intimate connection between Dunham and Davis.
“I was not happy to include these racy photos in the film but found it necessary to substantiate the intimate relationship between the two,” he said. “Those photos ended up in a men’s mail-order catalog of nude women, likely sold to them by Davis. I placed black bars on parts of the photos to be respectful.”

To establish the foundation for the photos, Gilbert documented that Davis was one of the founders of a photography club in Chicago, known as the “Lens Camera Club,” and that he specialized in nude photographs.

Later in life, Davis also penned a scurrilous, autobiographical sex novel, titled “Sex Rebel: Black,” in which he detailed an illicit sexual relationship with an underage woman named “Anne.” Gilbert believes the name was a thin disguise for Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham.

Gilbert reconstructs Obama’s autobiography, “Dreams from My Father,” and concludes that the tale of the goat-herding father from Kenya is a cover story, concocted to mask an inconvenient pregnancy.

The truth, Gilbert argues, is that Barack Obama II was born from the illicit sexual relationship that rebellious teenager Ann Dunham began with Davis after her parents forced her to move to Hawaii.

Gilbert believes that when Dunham first arrived in Hawaii after graduating from high school, she used the sexual relationship with Davis to act out her frustration that her parents would not permit her to fulfill her wish to attend the University of Washington in Seattle with her Mercer Island High School friends.

In 2010, Gilbert wrote and directed a film titled “Atomic Jihad: Ahmadinejad’s Coming War and Obama’s Politics of Defeat.” “Dreams from My Real Father” will be released this summer, with screenings in theaters across the country currently in the planning process.

Communist roots

The FBI had Davis under surveillance for 19 years, monitoring his support of the Communist Party both in Chicago and in Hawaii.

Gilbert portrays Obama as a “Red Diaper Baby,” a phenomenon among the radical left, referred to as “hand-me-down Marxism,” in which children of radical parents grow up to be radicals. Such was the case with much of the leadership of Students for a Democratic Society and the Weather Underground, including Obama senior political adviser David Axelrod, who was born to a mother who wrote for a communist newspaper in New York City.

Barack Obama Sr., Barack Obama II and Frank Marshall Davis

“Obama sold himself to America as the multi-cultural ideal, a man who stood above politics. His father was a goat herder from Kenya, he would bring people together, so it went,” Gilbert explained. “While voters will overlook some fudging by politicians, promoting a false family background to hide an agenda irreconcilable with American values is a totally unacceptable manipulation of the electorate.”

What Gilbert presents is a direct challenge to the official narrative, arguing it is more likely President Obama has a deeply disturbing family background and a hidden Marxist agenda.

“Unfortunately, Obama’s style is to minimize, misdirect, and outright lie about damaging information about his past,” Gilbert said. “I hope the media will now demand that he come clean about his family background, his political foundations and fully reveal his agenda for transforming America.”

In writing his autobiography, Obama masked his relationship with Davis, naming him only as “Frank,” a friend of his grandfather who “lived in a dilapidated house in a run-down section of Waikiki.”

Gerald Horne, a contributing editor to “Public Affairs,” an openly Marxist political review, made the first positive identification of “Frank” as Frank Marshall Davis.

In March 2007, Horne gave a speech at New York University on the occasion of the Communist Party USA archive being placed at an NYU library.

In that speech, Horne discussed Davis, noting that Davis, who was born in Kansas and lived much of his adult life in Chicago, had moved to Honolulu in 1948 at the suggestion of his good friend, actor Paul Robeson. In the 1940s, Robeson was an outspoken critic of segregation and racial discrimination in the U.S., a strong advocate of the Soviet Union and a member of the Communist Party USA.

Horne also documented Davis’s friendship with the Dunham family in Hawaii.

“Eventually, [Davis] befriended another family – a Euro-American family – that had migrated to Honolulu from Kansas, and a young woman from this family eventually had a child with a young student from Kenya East Africa who goes by the name of Barack Obama, who, retracing the steps of Davis, eventually decamped to Chicago.”

Lorne further stated Davis was “a decisive influence in helping [Obama] to find his present identity as an African-American, a people who have been the least anti-communist and the most left-leaning of any constituency in this nation.”

After Horne’s speech, the identity of “Frank” was never in doubt, nor his importance in the development of the young Barack Obama.

On Dec. 5, 1956, Davis appeared in executive session before the U.S. Senate Subcommittee investigating “the scope of Soviet activity in the United States,” one of the McCarthy-era panels seeking to expose communists considered to be a security threat.

Invoking his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination, Davis refused to answer a direct question asking if he was then a communist.

A year earlier, in 1955, a Commission on Subversive Activities organized by the government of the Territory of Hawaii identified Davis as a member of the Communist Party USA. The committee singled out for criticism several articles Davis published in the “Communist Honolulu Record” that were critical of the commission.

May 19th Communist Organization

Gilbert documents Obama’s association at Columbia University with what was known as the May 19th Communist Organization, an above-ground support group for the Weather Underground based in New York City from 1978 to 1985.

“May 19th” carried out raucous anti-Apartheid and anti-Klan protests and operated a host of front organizations.

At the time, Weather Underground co-founder William Ayers – Obama’s Chicago neighbor and colleague in education reform – wrote that May 19th provided “a sea for the guerrillas to swim in.”

Some May 19th members committed acts of violence and terrorism, such as the 1981 Nanuet Brinks robbery and murders, the bombing of South African offices in 1981 and the U.S. Capitol bombing in 1983.

“I spoke with a former FBI informant who told me the May 19th Communist Organization had a weapons training camp in the Catskill Mountains, run by former Black Panthers,” Gilbert told WND. “In addition, some May 19th members were sent to Cuba for several weeks each year with the Venceremos Brigade, a continuation of the SDS/Weather Underground program begun in the ’60s, for explosives training from Cuban intelligence, DGI.”

Obama’s election was not a sudden political phenomenon, Gilbert maintains.

“It was the culmination of an American socialist movement that Frank Marshall Davis nurtured in Chicago and Hawaii and has been quietly infiltrating the U.S. economy, universities and media for decades,” he explained. “To understand Obama’s plans for America, look no further than communist Frank Marshall Davis.”

Click here to view documentary trailer 

Is Obama on Putin's Payroll?

Excerpted from Dr. Jack Wheeler's column of the same name...
April 26, 2012

The answer to our question, is Zero on Putin's payroll?, is:  given his behavior, given his actions as president, it makes no difference whether he is or is not.  He could be a full-blown Manchurian Candidate.  He could be bought and paid for by the KGB.  He could be a brain-damaged black racist moonbat consumed with hatred for America.  He could be a megalomaniacal narcissistic sociopath.

It doesn't matter if he actually is any or all of these.  What matters is that his actions are such that he could be-for those actions are what he would do if he were.  So we need not make accusations for which we do not have solid proof.  It suffices to know that, whatever the cause, whatever his motivation, this man means us and our country mortal harm.  And he has the capacity, as President of the United States, to do so.  His every day in the Oval Office is dedicated to doing so.

What matters is:  Nobama 2012.  Our country's life depends on it.

The Punk Who Wants to Crucify the Oil Industry

Perhaps He Should Be "Crucified"
(OK, we'll reluctantly settle for him being fired...)

EPA Goal: "Crucify" Oil & Gas Companies

Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) took to the Senate floor today to draw attention to a video of a top EPA official saying the EPA’s “philosophy” is to “crucify” and “make examples” of oil and gas companies - just as the Romans crucified random citizens in areas they conquered to ensure obedience.

Inhofe quoted a little-watched video from 2010 of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) official, Region VI Administrator Al Armendariz, admitting that EPA’s “general philosophy” is to “crucify” and “make examples” of oil and gas companies.

In the video, Administrator Armendariz says:

“I was in a meeting once and I gave an analogy to my staff about my philosophy of enforcement, and I think it was probably a little crude and maybe not appropriate for the meeting, but I’ll go ahead and tell you what I said:

“It was kind of like how the Romans used to, you know, conquer villages in the Mediterranean.  They’d go in to a little Turkish town somewhere, they’d find the first five guys they saw and they’d crucify them.

“Then, you know, that town was really easy to manage for the next few years.”
“It’s a deterrent factor,” Armendariz said, explaining that the EPA is following the Romans’ philosophy for subjugating conquered villages.

Soon after Armendariz touted the EPA’s “philosophy,” the EPA began smear campaigns against natural gas producers, Inhofe’s office noted in advance of today’s Senate speech:

“Not long after Administrator Armendariz made these comments in 2010, EPA targeted US natural gas producers in Pennsylvania, Texas and Wyoming.

“In all three of these cases, EPA initially made headline-grabbing statements either insinuating or proclaiming outright that the use of hydraulic fracturing by American energy producers was the cause of water contamination, but in each case their comments were premature at best – and despite their most valiant efforts, they have been unable to find any sound scientific evidence to make this link.”

In his Senate speech, Sen. Inhofe said the video provides Americans with “a glimpse of the Obama administration’s true agenda.”

That agenda, Inhofe said, is to “incite fear” in the public with unsubstantiated claims and “intimidate” oil and gas companies with threats of unjustified fines and penalties – then, quietly backtrack once the public’s perception has been firmly jaded against oil and natural gas.

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

If I Wanted America to Fail

Click here to watch this brilliant and timely video

Clay vs. Liston 2012

Written by Jack Kelly   
Monday, 23 April 2012

On Feb. 25, 1964, Cassius Clay shocked the boxing world by defeating heavyweight champion Sonny Liston (9 days later, he would announce he was a Black Moslem to be known as Muhammad Ali).  Clay used his superior quickness to evade Liston's ponderous punches, and counterpunched so effectively that Liston didn't answer the bell for the 7th round.

The opening rounds of the general election campaign have resembled the Clay-Liston fight.  Mitt Romney has counterpunched so effectively Democrats were lying bleeding on the canvas before they knew what hit them.

Within hours after Democrat operative Hilary Rosen said on CNN that Mr. Romney's wife, Ann, a mother of five, "actually never worked a day in her life," Democrats were running from her like scalded dogs.

On a vacation trip in 1983, Seamus, the Romney family dog, rode in a crate on top of their station wagon.  Democrats hyped this as evidence of Mr. Romney's "insensitivity."  As a boy in Indonesia, Barack Hussein Obama ate dog, he said in his autobiography.  The Romney team pounced.

"One tweet from an iPad, and the Romney campaign had knocked back five years of dog stories," wrote Dave Weigel of Slate with grudging admiration.

Twice in as many weeks, the Romney team turned Democrat attacks against them.  I expect this to happen again and again.  The Dems will telegraph their punches, the Romney campaign will counterpunch.

Panicked, the Dems will swing more wildly, more often, exposing themselves, and will hit the canvas again and again.  And as they lie there, Romney will say the election should be about issues, not about nonsense like this.

With no achievements to tout, Democrats feel they must run down the other guys.  A CBS/New York Times poll last week indicated 42 percent of Americans like Mr. Obama personally, but only 29 percent like Mitt Romney, so Democrats think personal attacks on Mr. Romney will work.

But when a president seeks a second term, the election is a referendum on his performance in office.  The president's percentage of the popular vote tracks closely with his job approval, noted psephologist Sean Trende.

Americans give Mr. Obama such low marks on job performance that Washington Post political analyst Ed Rogers thinks "a serious challenge for the Romney campaign will be how to stay out of the way while Obama loses."

The president's numbers will improve if the economy does, but it is getting weaker.  So Democrats double down on personal attacks.  Their strategy is doomed.  Here are four reasons why:

*Mr. Romney's low personal approval rating is chiefly the residual effect of a nasty primary campaign.  It will dissipate as Republicans consolidate around their nominee.

*Mr. Obama's rating will drop.  Personal approval and job approval tend to converge, because if you don't like what a president is doing, you tend not to like him much, either.  And instead of attacking Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich, Mr. Romney will run ads criticizing the president.

*Mr. Obama's campaign strategy will accelerate the drop.  In Michigan Wednesday (4/18), he said: "Unlike some people, I wasn't born with a silver spoon in my mouth."  This strikes Americans as more petulant than presidential. 

*The more the president talks about Mr. Romney, and the less he talks about the issues which concern Americans, the more he seems out of touch, in over his head.

But Democrats are so accustomed to turning every issue into a personal attack they can't stop, even when its counterproductive.  To mix sports metaphors, Democrats are like a football team that runs the same play over and over, without regard to down and distance.

Early indications are a strategy of distract-and-smear won't work against Mitt Romney.  He counterpunches fast and hard, and then returns swiftly to the issues Americans care about.

Because he knows Americans don't have to like him to vote for him, or dislike President Obama to vote against him, Mr. Romney focuses like a laser on competence.  He uses effectively the contrast between Mr. Obama's words in 2008 and his subsequent deeds to make his points.  He doesn't call the president names.  He acts like the grownup in the race.

Even in polls which oversample Democrats, Mr. Romney already runs even with the president.  The whopping 10 point advantage the GOP enjoyed last Monday (4/16) in Rasmussen's generic Congressional poll indicates Republicans are more popular (or Democrats less popular) now than on the eve of the Republican landslide in 2010.

When Democrats such as Carter and Clinton -- or for that matter, Zero in 2008 -- have won in the past, they did so by being hypocritical, by paying fealty to "family values" they didn't really embrace.  But this time Zero is runnng hard left on social issues, which a Democrat hasn't done since George McGovern.

Romney, however, can capitalize on family values just because he has lived them.  Zero will make social issues an issue, and his extremism on them will drive centrist voters toward Romney without him having to make an overt pitch.

In every election but one since 1964 (2004), undecideds have broken heavily to the challenger.  And one more point:  John McCain never figured it out, but Romney understands who the real enemy is, and is prepared to deal with them appropriately.

It's early yet, but indications are Mitt Romney will win, and win big.

Jack Kelly is a former Marine and Green Beret and a former deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force in the Reagan administration. He is national security writer for the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.

Obama Team Stole Election, Bribed Jesse Jackson And Took Russian Money In 2008

April 23, 2012 By

According to internal Emails circulated among the staff at Stratfor, an Austin Texas based private intelligence gathering firm, John McCain was presented with proof that Democrats in Pennsylvania and Ohio used voter fraud to win those states and committed other disturbing crimes. The communiqués were stolen and made public by WikiLeaks.

An Email dated November 7, 2008 under the subject line “ Insight – The Dems & Dirty Tricks ** Internal Use Only – Pls Do Not Forward **,” was sent by Fred Burton, Stratfor’s V.P. of Intelligence. It said in part, The black Dems were caught stuffing the ballot boxes in Philly and Ohio as reported the night of the election and Sen. McCain chose not to fight. The matter is not dead inside the party. It now becomes a matter of sequence now as to how and when to “out”. 

Burton also mentioned a “six-figure” Democrat donation/bribe to Jesse Jackson to buy his silence about Israel. On October 14, 2008 Jackson told fellow attendees in at the World Policy Forum in Evian France a ‘President Obama’ would “remove the clout of Zionists who have controlled American policy for decades.”

Burton continued with an explosive charge he apparently considered quite believable, The hunt is on for the sleezy Russian money into O-mans coffers. A smoking gun has already been found. Will get more on this when the time is right. My source was too giddy to continue. Can you say Clinton and ChiCom funny money? This also becomes a matter of how and when to out.

This allegation makes some sense of Obama’s reassurances to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev caught by an open mic. Obama said “….but it’s important for him [Putin] to give me space.”

Medvedev responded: “Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you …”
Obama: “This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility.”

Medvedev: “I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir [Putin]…”

Fred Burton is a known quantity in the highest Intelligence circles. He has been Deputy Chief of the Department of State’s counterterrorism division for the Diplomatic Security Service (DSS).

Stratfor has acknowledged that last December its internal communications system was hacked and the group “Anonymous” has taken credit for the sabotage .  WikiLeaks started to publish Stratfor’s stolen Emails last month. Startfor will neither confirm nor deny whether the communiqués attributed to its staff are real or fabrications.

Congressman Darrell Issa are you listening?

The Puppeteer

New Retractable Roof for Democrat National Convention

The Difference

If Only It Were This Easy

Had Enough Yet?

A proposal from the Obama administration to prevent children from doing farm chores has drawn plenty of criticism from rural-district members of Congress. But now it’s attracting barbs from farm kids themselves.

The Department of Labor is poised to put the finishing touches on a rule that would apply child-labor laws to children working on family farms, prohibiting them from performing a list of jobs on their own families’ land.

Under the rules, children under 18 could no longer work “in the storing, marketing and transporting of farm product raw materials.”

“Prohibited places of employment,” a Department press release read, “would include country grain elevators, grain bins, silos, feed lots, stockyards, livestock exchanges and livestock auctions.”

The new regulations, first proposed August 31 by Labor Secretary Hilda Solis, would also revoke the government’s approval of safety training and certification taught by independent groups like 4-H and FFA, replacing them instead with a 90-hour federal government training course.