May 8, 2012
The "Occupy" movement,
which the Obama administration and much of the media have embraced, has
implications that reach far beyond the passing sensation it has
created.
The unwillingness of
authorities to put a stop to their organized disruptions of other people's
lives, their trespassing, vandalism and violence is a de facto suspension, if
not repeal, of the 14th Amendment's requirement that the government provide
"equal protection of the laws" to all its citizens.
How did the "Occupy"
movement acquire such immunity from the laws that the rest of us are expected to
obey? Simply by shouting politically correct slogans and calling themselves
representatives of the 99 percent against the 1
percent.
But just when did the 99
percent elect them as their representatives? If in fact 99 percent of the people
in the country were like these "Occupy" mobs, we would not have a country. We
would have anarchy.
Democracy does not mean
mob rule. It means majority rule. If the "Occupy" movement, or any other mob,
actually represents a majority, then they already have the votes to accomplish
legally whatever they are trying to accomplish by illegal
means.
Mob rule means imposing
what the mob wants, regardless of what the majority of voters want. It is the
antithesis of democracy.
In San Francisco, when the
mob smashed the plate-glass window of a small business shop, the owner put up
some plywood to replace the glass, and the mob wrote graffiti on his plywood.
The consequences? None for the mob, but a citation for the shop owner for not
removing the graffiti.
When trespassers blocking
other people at the University of California, Davis refused to disperse, and
locked their arms with one another to prevent the police from being able to
physically remove them, the police finally resorted to pepper spray to break up
this human logjam.
The result? The police
have been strongly criticized for enforcing the law. Apparently pepper spray is
unpleasant, and people who break the law are not supposed to have unpleasant
things done to them. Which is to say, we need to take the "enforcement" out of
"law enforcement."
Everybody is not given
these exemptions from paying the consequences of their own illegal acts. Only
people who are currently in vogue with the elites of the left -- in the media,
in politics and in academia.
The 14th Amendment? What
is the Constitution or the laws when it comes to ideological soul mates,
especially young soul mates who remind the aging 1960s radicals of their
youth?
Neither in this or any
other issue can the Constitution protect us if we don't protect the
Constitution. When all is said and done, the Constitution is a document, a piece
of paper.
If we don't vote out of
office, or impeach, those who violate the Constitution, or who refuse to enforce
the law, the steady erosion of Constitutional protections will ultimately render
it meaningless. Everything will just become a question of whose ox is gored and
what is the political expediency of the moment.
There has been much
concern, rightly expressed, about the rusting of bridges around the country, and
the crumbling and corrosion of other parts of the physical infrastructure. But
the crumbling of the moral infrastructure is no less
deadly.
The police cannot maintain
law and order, even if the political authorities do not tie their hands in
advance or undermine them with second-guessing after the
fact.
The police are the last
line of defense against barbarism, but they are equipped only to handle that
minority who are not stopped by the first lines of defense, beginning with the
moral principles taught at home and upheld by families, schools, and
communities.
But if everyone takes the
path of least resistance -- if politicians pander to particular constituencies
and judges give only wrist slaps to particular groups or mobs who are currently
in vogue, and educators indoctrinate their students with "non-judgmental"
attitudes -- then the moral infrastructure corrodes and
crumbles.
The moral infrastructure
is one of the intangibles, without which the tangibles don't work. Like the
physical infrastructure, its neglect in the short run invites disaster in the
long run.
No comments:
Post a Comment